Home About Us Cover Story Selected Articles
Cover Story 专题报道 > Singapore American School — Changing for the 21st Century
培育21世纪世界领袖的国际学校 — 专访新加坡美国学校校监金博尔博士和高中部校长斯图亚特博士
Singapore American School — Changing for the 21st Century
Selina Tan • Eunice Chow
Photos courtesy of SAS
Published: EduNation, Issue 3, May-Jun 2013
Nearly a year into his stint as the 12th Superintendent of the Singapore American School (SAS), Dr Chip Kimball speaks enthusiastically about his mission for change.

Dr Kimball, who was formerly the Superintendent of Lake Washington School District in Redmond, Washington, said, "The (SAS) Board has asked me to evaluate the viability of strategic growth — is there a market and demand for it? How can we accommodate that and include the creation of innovative programmes for our students? We spent time with the High School this year looking at schools around the globe figuring what innovative programmes there are that we do not know of, and we will do the same with our Elementary and Middle Schools next year to look at innovation and figure out what it is we want to create over the next five years."

What he wants to create is a breed of graduates who can compete and win in the global talent pool.

Population Diversity

SAS itself has a diverse population. Within the student body, nearly 70 per cent are United States (US) citizens. The other 30 per cent come from as many as 50 different countries. Mixing with their peers therefore gives students the opportunity to interact with a wide variety of ethnicities on a daily basis, which High School Principal, Dr Tim Stuart, believes gives them a good grounding for living in a shrinking world.

At SAS, admission relies on a variety of factors. Chief among them is the professional belief that a student will thrive in an environment of academic challenge, rapid pace and diverse experiences with the support of knowledgeable international educators and caring mentors. SAS was established to support US citizens and non-US citizens working for US companies. It also serves over 200 Singaporean students at present.

"If we believe that we have an academic programme that benefits a child, and the potential student can contribute meaningfully to our community, we will move toward acceptance as space becomes available.

"Considering that we are really a broad community school, we accept a very wide variety of students. We meet the need for personal excellence displayed by highly intelligent students who are very advanced academically. And, we meet that same need for students who, at entry level, may struggle or demonstrate learning challenges and needs. We believe each will find niche areas of personal excellence and contribution during their time at SAS and beyond," said Dr Stuart.

The US Education Model

As an American school with an international perspective, SAS faithfully follows the US education model and while there may be similarities between the local and the American systems, they are also clearly very different.

"If I were to identify the biggest difference between the Singaporean model and the US model, the greatest strength of the American model is that it is innately, if done correctly, designed to never give up on a child," explained Dr Stuart, who has been working in international schools for 16 years now. "There is always a chance for children to learn, to learn more, to do better, to grow at different rates, to learn at different speeds, to mature at different ages, and the American system doesn't put any child in a box that is unrecoverable."

Generally, the US paradigm is recognised as being very concerned with educating the whole child and taking a holistic approach to education via the liberal arts.

To that end, there is no sorting mechanism or streaming within the system, and neither is there at SAS. Different students, even within the same grade, take subjects at different levels and take tests based on their differing abilities. For example, students can split a year-long Mathematics course over two years, or choose to study geometry at the age of 12 or 15 or whenever they are ready. The university-like system allows students the room to advance to different levels at different ages, so even 15-year-olds can study high-level calculus if they are ready.

"At the end of the day, it's all based on their abilities, their individual aptitude and their readiness. If you go back to the belief that we're not here to sort kids, the only reason a school would offer one level of test questions is so you can understand who makes it and who doesn't. But since we don't believe that that's our ideal educational paradigm, our primary objective is to test that every child is learning. Hence, if a student is at a lower level in one subject ability, we will offer a course of study that will help and challenge him, and if he displays exceptional prowess in another subject, he will be put at a much higher level than his peers even though they are all in the same grade."

SAS faithfully replicates the resources one might find in an exceptional public high school in the US. However, if there is a way in which SAS does not fit the usual mould, it would be in the sheer number of courses — and particularly of specialised and higher level courses — that it is able to offer. And this wealth of provision stems from the atypical strength and depth of its staff and the extra needs brought about by its international perspective and population.

"It's all about trying to find the right level of challenge and rigour that will move individuals from one step to the next and continue to grow, because education is a lifelong growth journey. And understanding this will help us to target success in the 21st century, where change is rapid, and where there are therefore demands for added flexibility and self-awareness," Dr Stuart said.

Fulfilling Potential the American Way

To further encourage the growth of students, Dr Kimball is also supportive of the idea of tailor-making the educational experience for individuals. However, the challenge lies in the availability of resources and the scale in which this can be done. A way to overcome this is through technology. As an example, Dr Kimball talked about the Khan Academy, a non-profit organisation which provides free online world-class education.

"If some lessons are available on the Khan Academy, it frees up teaching time to make the lessons more individualised. If you harness the expertise of people and resources via technology, then some of the work in education can be tailor-made. However, there are a number of structures that need to be addressed in order to do that," he said.

The structures referred to are the often unchallenged things like the length of the school year, the school day, the number of contact hours and the number of students in a classroom, all of which Dr Kimball calls artificial constraints.

"We need to remove ourselves from those constraints, and think about how can we serve students, harness technology, manpower and resources and do it differently. We need to address how we run our school calendar and classes, how teacher time is allocated, how we access technology, and consider poor communities where access to technology is more challenging. There are obstacles, but there is a solution and we have to do it in a way that actually costs less money."

Preparing for the Future

"An ongoing discussion concerns 21st century learning — namely, how do educators inculcate the relevant soft skills such as effective communication, and how do schools get their students to develop critical thinking, data analysis, collaboration, creativity and most importantly, problem solving skills," said Dr Stuart.

The School's priority is to home in on developing 21st century skills — communication, collaboration, problem solving, and a global mindset.

Students will also need the basic skills of reading and writing well together with a strong foundation in Mathematics and Science. Thereafter, they will need to combine basic and 21st century skills and learn to apply them to different contexts or to contexts which do not exist yet.

"How do you build the adaptability, resilience, and hard work required and do it in a way that also teaches them to work with others? Because if you create a culture where it's only about being the individual contributor and the individual winner, then that individual will lose. What we know from good organisations and great products is that it always takes a team. So we have to be collaborators and competitors at the same time and understand how to do that well. At SAS we do that by providing a lot of different opportunities and by helping students understand their giftedness and their passions," Dr Kimball elaborated.

As such, the future SAS is one where experiences are more meaningful, more deeply embedded in work and where the culture is more global. For example, students at SAS might spend a semester in China, India, Europe, or the US doing something they're identified as their interest or passion, where they can get real world experiences and solve somebody else's problems with a team.

Drawing Inspiration From Others

Much can also be learnt from the Singapore system. Having been in Singapore since July 2012, Dr Kimball is interested in the local education system and how SAS and the Ministry of Education (MOE) can collaborate. One of the things he is struck by is how educators and policymakers in Singapore and the US are equally keen to improve their respective systems.

"I'm impressed with the results and with some of the things Singapore has been able to accomplish, but some of the methodology is inconsistent with what my beliefs are regarding what good education looks like. What I want to do is learn from the things the Singapore system does very well, but not abandon our values around the whole child, around a multi-disciplinary approach to the problems, problem solving and future thinking. Those, including innovation, are what we hold on to pretty tightly. Those are areas that Singapore struggles with a bit.

"One of the things I appreciate about what's happening in Singapore as opposed to what's happening in the US is that in Singapore there's a cultural priority that is put on education, and in the US, in my opinion, we're lost our way a little bit. It is not as much of a cultural national priority in the US as it is in Singapore. And part of that is because we're gotten a little complacent.

"I'm very interested in exploring these issues together with MOE because they want to know what we do and why we do it, what works and what doesn't, and we're curious about what they do as well. When you have two partners that are curious it makes for a perfect partnership," Dr Kimball said.

Through past interactions and dialogues, Dr Stuart has come to the significant realisation that the global bearers of education are starting to blend.

"We're still wrestling with the same things, despite coming from entirely disparate paradigms. I think then, we're all coming together, trying to figure out how to get kids to be able to apply learning. This is an area that I don't think Singapore has done a very good job in, and I don't think the US has done a very good job in either, but we're going to get somewhere by meeting in the middle.

"That's where the future of education is going to be at. Schools all over the world, starting from here, will introduce a blended form of teaching rigorous content and concepts and then providing students with the necessary platforms to apply that learning in constructive and authentic ways. This is the missing link both in the Singapore and US systems.

"And that is why I believe that SAS is creating the world's future leaders, because there is no better place or platform for an American child to understand Asia and all of its culture and dynamics than right here in Singapore. By the same token, for Singaporean students to be ultimately successful in a global way, they are going to have to understand the mechanics of practical intelligence: how to think out of the box and act creatively to achieve maximum positive effect," Dr Stuart said.

A Problem-solving Approach to Improving Education

SAS has thus asked Dr Kimball to help identify the gaps and lead the change.

"Identifying a problem is usually more complex than most people think. There is never a single problem, and consequently, never a single solution. Instead, there is a combination of problems — school size, school system, teacher quality et cetera — which is what makes schooling so challenging. There is no single solution to the system that you can scale across the system, state or nation. When I came to SAS I began to try to identify the issues it is facing. Is it teacher quality, size, money, governance, culture, curriculum, or technology?"

In order to correctly identify the problems, the first thing Dr Kimball does is to assess the environment. He looks at the academic achievement and the thinking skills of the students, whether they are fulfilling their potential and if the environment is conducive.

"Assessment is a big question — what we are assessing and how do we know. Then I look at cultural and quality components. There's a series of measures that we think about," he said.

After the environmental assessment and problem identification has taken place the vision can begin to be articulated.

"The first way that you approach the problem is by painting a direction of where you want to go. You have to have a reason why. If people do not have a compelling reason why they should change, they will not change. Paint a vision, and that vision is often developed from what your clientele, in our case, parents and students, want for their future. If you can present them with a compelling case, then you have to build the structure that supports that.

"Next you have to build a capacity in the organisation to change — educating and giving them opportunities for growth. So you're building capacity and creating incentives for them to move to that new place. And sometimes it's carrots — incentives, sometimes it's sticks — consequences. You balance those very carefully, and although it's always more healthy to have more carrot than stick, in almost all cases you need a bit of both," Dr Kimball said.

Then comes the need to put structures, processes and policies in place to effect the change.

"You have to have all of these, and that's what we're trying to do here. We have a community that is very supportive of educational reforms, of being progressive, relevant and connected to what's happening to the world economy. Therefore the time is ripe for us to effect tremendous change. One of our obstacles is that we're also been very successful, and success can be an obstacle because people are likely to say, 'Why change? Look at how good we are.' So we have to provide a really compelling case to change and we're working on that."

Leadership Necessary to Implement Change

Dr Kimball is confident that much can be done, especially since people of the information age are primed for change and innovation. To that end, he is mindful that creating the right environment where people feel free to emulate is key.

"Often we feel very constrained and almost beaten down by bureaucracy, leadership, money. It's a leadership question, and sometimes we just don't create good environments for people to innovate. Clayton Christensen, who wrote the book Disrupting Class, used the private sector as an example and attempted to apply it to the education sector. He said innovation rarely, if ever, happens inside an institution. You have to innovate outside the institution and re-insert it into the system because bureaucracies are created to protect themselves and I am trying here to prove that wrong.

"I'm trying to make a statement and to say that if the leadership insists that innovation is a core requirement then we can innovate. And there are a few places where it has been done — the survival of high-tech companies, for instance, is necessitated by innovation. Unfortunately, educational institutions have survived for 200 years by not being innovative. To break that mould and to foster innovation I'm telling our teachers, 'Not only is it okay for you to innovate, but you're going to be rewarded if you innovate.' And it's all about systems of rewards — internally, culturally and even monetarily," Dr Kimball concluded.

Dr Chip Kimball — Leading by Example

Dr Kimball's interest in pushing the envelope and innovating goes back to when he was in his second year of teaching as a Biology teacher.

"I was not very traditional from the very beginning. In my second year of teaching, I created an integrated Biology-English curriculum with another colleague. We were one out of only twenty in the US to get a large grant for this integrated Biology-English curriculum which was very out-of-the box, and we got the support of the administrative system of the school. I'm a fighter, and have fought the system over and over again," said Dr Kimball.

He came to Singapore for two reasons. "The first reason is that when I was in the US I was standing on the podium talking about how we could be globally competitive, and I felt that most American educators had no idea what competing globally looks or feels like. There's a cultural competency that is required in order to be competitive and effective in a global workplace. And I was afraid I didn't get it either. So in order for me to be the leader I believe I can be, I wanted to live in Asia so I could truly understand how to be culturally competent as it relates to leadership in education."

The second reason is that in the US public system, there are constraints such as state and federal bureaucracy which limits innovation. By coming to Singapore, specifically SAS, Dr Kimball hopes to test his theory of change and innovation in a place where limitations are removed. He hopes to achieve a good outcome, and thereafter bring it back to the US to do it on a larger scale.


 


封面故事 > 培育21世纪世界领袖的国际学校 — 专访新加坡美国学校校监金博尔博士和高中部校长斯图亚特博士
培育21世纪世界领袖的国际学校
— 专访新加坡美国学校校监金博尔博士和高中部校长斯图亚特博士
文:丘珞君
图:新加坡美国学校提供
刊载:《新学》, 第3期,2013年5月-6月
全球化进程中,东西方文化因人口流动率提高而产生越来越多的交流。东方人到西方工作、求学,西方人到东方投资、赚钱。作为区域的交通与经济枢纽,许多美国公司入驻新加坡,新加坡美国学校早在半世纪前已经设立。

新加坡美国学校第十二任校监齐普·金博尔博士说:“作为一所学校,我们需要帮助孩子为迅速变化的未来做好准备,所谓21世纪技能,是指在全球化的环境里能与其他人沟通、合作,解决复杂难题的能力。”

高中部校长提姆·斯图亚特博士表示:“美国人想在21世纪环球化经济的时代成功,就必须了解亚洲思维。未来,至少在20至30年内,亚洲是世界经济的轴心。新加坡美国学校正在做着培育未来世界领袖的工作。我认为世界上再没有任何一个地方,比在新加坡的美国学校更能让美国孩子了解亚洲。我们培养出来的学生将被跨国公司争相聘用,因为他们有创意思维、能解决问题、能了解亚洲,还能说华语,认识亚洲文化和它的蓬勃生机。”

两位学校领导人分别接受《新学》新加坡教育双语双月刊访问,对学生的期望有不约而同的见解,他们各自陈述如何在新加坡这个亚洲国家经营属于国际的美国学校的思维。

不只强于竞争 还要擅长合作

金博尔是美国华盛顿湖校区50所学校、2300名教职员、2万5000名学生熟悉的领导人。1996年,他从担任这个美国第六大校区的助理督导做起,之后不断擢升,历经区域督导、副督导,2007年升任督导,至2012年出任新加坡美国学校校监。他有着丰富掌管校群、推动改革、提升成绩的经验。

在任期间,他为华盛顿湖校区解决了许多问题,推行了许多新措施,让校区内的50所学校无论是在创新、领导能力、策略等方面都有显著进步。他研究、开发并推行了称为“2020愿景”的战略性计划,其中有非常针对性的策略,如加强学生进大学和加入环球市场的准备,让已经有出色表现的华盛顿湖校区的学校,在2010和2011年分别获得10个和11个华盛顿最佳进步表现奖,是全州校区中成绩最好的。他同时推行了一个受州政府认同的教师顾问模式,为新老师提供更好的助力,使五年教学经验的新教师的离职率下跌10%。

金博尔总是在思考如何用创意的方法让学校更进步,让学生更成功。他深知在全球化的21世纪,要成功,学术卓越只是其中一个因素。

他说:“创意对现代学生很重要,他们不只要掌握基本的学术技巧:精于读写、有扎实的数理基础,还要结合21世纪的技能,加以应用,有些技能可能还是前所未有的。如今,美国学生无论是在本国或在新加坡,都要和来自印度、中国、马来西亚和新加坡的优秀生竞争工作,他们面对的是个充满竞争的世界。

“因此,学校的课程必须培养学生的适应能力、毅力、努力,还要教导学生团队合作的精神和技巧。如果我们只建立起提倡单打独斗、为个人荣耀而战的文化,我们的学生必定失败。一样好的产品或一家好的公司的共同点,是他们背后都有一个团队在努力。我们要学生不只强于竞争,还要擅长合作。

“我们还根据学生的长处和热忱,提供机会,让学生从中学习,彼此合作,在团队中作出贡献。因为很多的研究显示,如果我们针对学生的热忱培养他,他们会更加努力不懈地朝着目标前进。”

确认问题再制定愿景

2012年7月金博尔出任新加坡美国学校总监,如何重新建设美国学校这项大工程,对经验丰富的金博尔来说正是他的所长。他说,在定下任何目标之前,首先要“找出问题”。

“找出问题远比想象中复杂。在教育领域,没有任何问题是单一性质的,因此也没有任何解决的单一标准方案。教育的问题很多,如:学校的规模、课程内容、教师素质等,千丝万缕,是极其复杂、充满挑战性的。从前在华盛顿湖校区的问题是从学校到州到国家,不可能用单一的标准方案解决。如今来到新加坡美国学校,我要找出学校所面对的问题,是师资、学校规模、财政、管理、文化、课程、还是科技?很多方面要观察、要思考。”

要有正确的方法来准确辨认问题。金博尔的方法是先对环境进行评估。

他说:“我们必须知道要评估什么,如何得到这些资料。以学生的学术表现和思考技巧为例,我们要评估学生是否达到我们对他的期望,以及所提供的环境是否利于学生的发展。之后,再分析学校的文化和素质等导因。我们有一系列的参考标准。”

评估环境,找出问题后,可以清楚制定愿景。

“要解决问题,首先要决定方向,要师出有名。如果没有一个吸引人的理由,人们是不会想改变的。构想愿景的时候,要以顾客群所向往的未来作为出发点。我们的顾客就是家长和学生。有了吸引人的愿景后,就要建立可以支持这个愿景的架构。

“了解愿景的同时,学校还要有成长的机会,才有能力改变。我的方法是通过奖赏和惩罚来刺激大家向目标前进;有时给予奖赏,加以鼓励,有时则用后果来警惕他们。需要软硬兼施,两者须小心平衡,多说正面的鼓励往往是比较好的。”

方向和架构都有了,可以向共同的目标迈进。

“新加坡美国学校社群非常支持进取、支持教育改革,希望学校紧跟世界经济的动向,提供相关的教育。既然有了方向和架构,正是进行重大改变的时候。然而,学校目前的成功,可能成为阻拦我们改变的一个障碍。人们会说:‘我们都这么好了,为什么还要改变?’因此,我们正在思考,拟定一个非常吸引人的愿景,试图说服大家改变、进步。”

不同文化不同标准造成迷思

新加坡人对美国教育不甚了解,瞎子摸象般形成的一种观念是:美国学校的课业较本地学校的简单,考试更容易拿高分。高中部校长斯图亚特马上说“这是个笼统的刻板印象,其实并不真确!”。造成这刻板印象的原因,是因东西方教育培养人才,各有不同的出发点。

他说:“在亚洲,大家都想知道谁是最好,谁得第一。然而,最好的只有一个,第一名只有一人,亚洲通过分流分类的机制清楚知道谁是第一名、第10名或第35名,这在美国教育制度是没有的。

“美国教育的问题在认同每个孩子都是第一名,都是最好,都是天才。但是孩子真是这样吗?不是。亚洲教育方面,则应该明白孩子虽然位居第一,其实还有很多努力的空间。”

斯图亚特举了一本谈智商的书《异类:不一样的成功启示录》(The Outliers)说,作者认为问题不在“你是否最聪明?”而在“你是否够聪明?”如果你够聪明成为一个物理学家,接下来能让你成功的要素,是你能否跟人沟通?能否有创意思维?能否迅速解决问题?能否与人相处,合作无间?这些都是所谓“软技能”,决定你成为一个物理学家后,能否成功的重要因素。这些因素已经和智商无关。这是东西方不同文化的人最需要明白的道理。

斯图亚特说:“我最担心的是我们是否培育了最聪明的人却无法和人沟通?最聪明的人却没有创意思维?最聪明的人却无法和人合作?没想到当我和新加坡的教育工作 者对话时,他们竟然也跟我有同样的忧虑。

“第8级(中二)那年,我做了一趟智商测试,分数极低,显示我是个头脑迟钝者,连我的兄弟姐妹都这么说,认为这个分数准确地说明我就是这样一个人。对我来说,那次智商测验,其实是个语文测验而非智力测验。从小我读的是法文,不明白这个英文智商测验在问些什么。这个惨痛经验,让我想到智商测验的分数很容易给孩子贴上标签,标明他是个聪明孩子,还是个笨孩子。其实,智商跟这个孩子长大能否成功,根本不相干,可惜大家都非常相信智商测试和它的成绩,并且忘记真相并非如此。”

美国式和新加坡式教育模式的差异

谈到美国教育的模式,斯图亚特说:“新加坡美国学校实践美国人‘每个孩子都有其天赋’的教育信念,这是‘美国梦’的由来。美国梦相信每个人都能成功。人无论多穷,受多差的教育,都能成功。就像奥巴马总统那样。因此,美国的教育绝不放弃任何一个孩子,永远让孩子根据自己的进度去成长,为他们提供学习,学更多、学更好,以及有回转、从头来过的机会。即便在中学是个成绩最差的学生,还有社区学院会录取他们,让他们接受大学教育,日后成为医生,做个成功的人。对美国孩子来说,机会是永远有的,升学的渠道也永远是畅通的。美国教育制度就建立在这个信念上。但从现实看,却不一定永远行得通,美国梦也不是没有问题。

“只要到原住民保留区去走走,我们会看到孩子无论多聪明,却因为父亲坐牢,母亲靠福利金过活,他只能辍学,到便利店工作,赚钱养家,这是社会真实的状况。不过,到这个孩子长大,30岁时候想读书的话,他可以到社区学院读大学,只要他渴望读书,机会永远是有的。

“新加坡的情况显然有所不同。新加坡的孩子很小被分流的机制,挑选出数学科学成绩优异的学生,之后,能走的路越来越窄,即便能进理工学院,在年仅19岁的岁月,还不曾当兵,还搞不清楚左脚和右脚的时候,孩子的前程已经被决定了。男孩一般成熟得比较晚,有的到22岁、25岁或甚至30岁才能把事情搞清楚。我想这是美国式教育和新加坡式教育最大的不同处。”

金博尔赞同斯图亚特的见解。他说:“每个学生都有他的长处及各自的价值,栽培和滋养他们是我们的责任。我们相信,只要有适合的环境条件,学生就会成长。”

新加坡美国学校的做法

美式教育的重点既然不在挑选学生,不为学生分类,就全然不采用考题全班全级一致的做法,校方根据学生的水平分级,让他们更好地学习。

斯图亚特说:“我们的教学目的既然不在挑选学生,就没有必要出全级一样的考题,去分辨谁能答对最多题目,谁能做最难的题目;而是根据每个孩子的程度,出最能考验他们了解了多少,学习了多少的题目。我们包容不同学习能力的学生。

“同一个科目有我们六种不同水平的课程,测试的题目也分成六种,为的是要看孩子学到多少。我们根据学生的能力来分配适合他们水平的课程,给他们适度的挑战和难度,让他们一步一步慢慢成长,希望他们更上层楼,明年可以读更高水平的课程。就以华文课来说,来自讲华语家庭的学生,当然不可能和家里没有人讲华语的同学同班。说到考题,我们的题目其实绝不简单。同年级的新加坡学校学生可能会被我们最高等级的考题难倒。所以说,我们绝不是一般人以为课业简单,考试容易拿高分的学校。”

在科目水平分级制下,学生很可能在每个科目跟不同的同学上课,包括“越级”和不同年级的同学一起上课,所以美国学校的授课模式与大学很相似,教师有自己的课室,学生是到不同教师的课室上课。

金博尔说:“今天,各种教育系统里最大的问题,是‘时间’左右‘学习’,时间是固定的,到了指定的时间,就算还没学完,学习也必须停止。

“相同的课程内容,学生能掌握的时间,其实长短不一,有些学生很快学会,有的可能需要更长的时间。我们应该调整每个孩子学习的时间或投资资源,让学生能更顺利学完所有的概念和理论。然而,学校普遍上没有这么做。这对学生的成长是不好的。”

金博尔也支持为学生量身设计课程,这个做法的困难在于到底可以为多少学生提供个人化的教育体验。其中一个解决方法,是运用高科技。金博尔举了可汗学院在网上开班授课的例子:“学生到可汗学院的网站上课,可以省下在学校的上课时间,学校课程就可以更个人化。教学可以通过高科技,集合人力、物力,来为学生‘量身定制’。同时,一些结构还必须改变,一成不变的话,往往限制了未来的教育发展。

“这些结构包括学年的长短、每节课时间的长短,和一班的学生人数多少等。我们要突破传统,从根本思考,充分利用科技、人力和物力,加以变通,以便更好地为学生服务。学年行事历、各科节数、师资安排、科技运用等都要重新检讨。其中当然有困难,但也必有解决的办法。”

招揽教师组成专业学习社群

为了在异地打造美国环境及文化,新加坡美国学校所招聘的教师99%来自美国、加拿大、澳大利亚、新西兰等国家,接受过美式教学训练。

斯图亚特说:“我们要求所有教师都必须遵循美国学校的教育理念。所招聘的新加坡教师,会要求他们是在美国、澳大利亚或新西兰,这些施行美国教育制度的大学毕业。

“正如新加坡学校,我们也希望建立一个‘专业学习社群’,让教师一起设计课程、出考题、拟定教学目标、分享教学心得。我们相信大家只有在共同的框架底下,有共同的教育哲学、说相同的教学‘语言’,志同道合,才能把学生教好。

“我们需要在教学方面有共同理念的人一起工作,大家有教学的‘共同’语言比较好。对于有些自认是世界第一流的教师,却没有办法和同事合作,这种人我们没有办法录用。在我们这里教书,必须靠团队合作,不能合作的教师,无论多强我们都不要。

“我们对教师的第一要求是必须关心孩子,同时是一个分分秒秒爱学习的人,第三则要专业能力非常强。一个能爱孩子、爱学习,又能掌握好所教科目的专业知识的教师,是一个能赢得学生尊敬的好教师。

“正如我们的办学使命:‘提供具国际视角的理想美国式教育’,我们的国际视角来自于多方面:不同国家的教师与学生群体的多元性、不同的学术科目、不同的课外活动、社区服务活动。这些加在一起,我称之为‘美丽的多元环境’。”

不设入学试门槛

新加坡美国学校采用美国式教育,是很多旅居本地的外国人的理想学校,入学等候名单很长,但校方不设入学试门槛。斯图亚特强调,学校的办学目的是服务美国社群。“我们的社群主要由美国公民或父母在美国公司工作的孩子组成,这群人在入学程序上有第一优先权。其次是在其他国家公司工作的美国公民。我们按优先权排出不同等级。只要符合任何一级的条件,就会被录取。因此,我们没有入学试,也没有面试,对学生的学术能力没有严苛要求。我们的学生从特别聪明到在学习方面有困难和需要特别照顾的都有。我们不像华侨中学,他们录取新加坡最佳3%学生,我们和东南亚联合世界学院也不一样,他们给入学试,挑选成绩好的学生。我们只是一所包容性很强的社区学校。

“我们招生处极有经验的辅导员单凭学生交来的成绩单,就可以做出录取与否的决定,除非有疑问,才会进行面试或测试。譬如到我们学校来的中国孩子,会接受一个英文作为第二语文最初级水平的测试,确定他是否真能在我们的环境学习。不过,这也看孩子的年龄,年纪越小,能不能说英语,越不是问题,因为还有很长时间可以学习。到了中学,如第9级(中三)才进来,就比较困难,因为四年后他是否能考进美国大学,就成了我们最大的考量。”

通过合作相互学习

到新加坡出任美国学校校监已经快一年,这10个月的接触,使金博尔对新加坡的教育系统产生兴趣,也非常希望能够和新加坡教育部合作。

他说:“新美两国的教育工作者,都在不断尝试改进现有系统,以求不断进步。

“新加坡在教育领域的成就令我印象深刻,但其中一些方法我并不完全认同。在参考新加坡教育系统的同时,我会坚持美国‘全面教育’的理念,就是要教育全人,以多学科角度看待问题、解决问题,设想未来,不断创新。这些是我们所坚持的,新加坡在这些方面则还有进步的空间。”

尽管新加坡的教育系统不尽完美,金博尔仍然看到其可取之处:“我欣赏新加坡把教育放在第一位的文化,美国在这方面已经走偏了。不像新加坡,教育不再是美国文化或国家发展的重点。作为世界强国,美国在经济方面非常成功,致使下一代过于安逸,不再重视教育,不再把教育视为未来发展的基石。

“我非常有兴趣和新加坡教育部探讨这些课题,相信他们也对我们一样好奇,想知道我们在做什么,为什么这么做,是否成功等等。两个伙伴如果对彼此都感到好奇,就能合作无间。”

出任新加坡美国学校高中部校长三年,斯图亚特发现新加坡一些学校的教学模式是美国学校可以借鉴的。

他说,既然未来一个人能否成功,取决于他能否跟人沟通、能否有创意思维、能否迅速解决问题、能否与人相处。这些都是所谓“软技能”的学习。那美国学校第一个要学习的对象就是向新加坡共和理工学院学习如何培养学生解决问题的能力。

他说:“共和理工学院是‘问题学习法’教学的高手,吸引了世界无数的人来取经,可惜新加坡却没有太多人重视共和理工在这方面的特长。共和理工学院就在兀兰,隔我们学校不远,我要好好利用这个机会去和他们结成合作伙伴,去向他们学习。

“新加坡为提升教师推展的‘专业学习社群’计划也做得很好。例如如何确认需要学习的目标、发展共同的评估;评估数据;根据学习的表现,决定教学法等等,都做得很好,我们可以在上述两方面进行合作。

“我们的学生和本地学校来往甚密。单是高中部就有50个服务团体。第12级(高二)的学生到本地学校去为他们进行阅读和补习的工作,还到本地很多慈善机构和志愿团体服务,例如去盲人学校探访他们,并为他们筹款。

“近日我们开始和国大数理中学、华侨中学和莱佛士书院在应用科学方面合作。此外,也和本地学校一起参加辩论会、机器人制作比赛。在‘模拟联合国’会议上和不同学校对话,我们还举办‘国际课题研讨会’,邀请新加坡学校到我们校园来交流。”

双方合作,当中必有挑战,斯图亚特说:“和本地学校合作,最大的问题是两国学校放假的时段不同,但我们还是能尽量找到时间交流。新加坡可说是世界上最有活力的城市之一,我们还可以更好地利用身处在新加坡的地利,提供一个与新加坡本土接轨的新的美国教育体验,重新建构美国学校。”

Chip Kimball (Dr) / 齐普 • 金博尔博士
Dr Chip Kimball is a progressive leader with a track record of excellence at the school, district, state and national level. He has over 25 years of experience in the education field, and prior to coming to Singapore in July 2012, was the Superintendent of Lake Washington School District in the United States. 齐普·金博尔是个进取的领导,在管理校区方面有优越成绩,并得到区、州甚至国家级的认可。金博尔在教育领域拥有25年经验,2012年7月来新出任新加坡美国学校校监之前,他是美国华盛顿湖校区督导。

Tim Stuart (Dr) / 提姆 • 斯图亚特博士
Before becoming the High School Principal of the Singapore American School in 2010, Dr Tim Stuart抯 professional teaching and administrative experiences took him to places as diverse as Turkey, Switzerland, and the Navajo Reservation in New Mexico. For three years, he was the High School Principal at Jakarta International School in Indonesia. 2010年出任新加坡美国学校的高中部校长之前,教学与行政经验丰富的提姆·斯图亚特曾经在土耳其、瑞士和美国新墨西哥州的纳瓦荷原住民保护区任教。他也曾担任印尼雅加达国际学校的校长三年。

 

» Past Issues
» Last issue
» Contents

Contact us   |   Advertise with us   |   Privacy Policy
Published by WS Education is a subsidiary of

Copyright © 2021 EduNation Co. All rights reserved.